Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Nov 2005 17:02 UTC, submitted by Megatux
Thread beginning with comment 65031
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: There are easier ways to kill GNOME
by modmans2ndcoming on Sun 27th Nov 2005 06:42
in reply to "RE[3]: There are easier ways to kill GNOME"
related only by the hierarchal structure of language development.
Syntax can be right, but if the semantics are off, you have a logic error.
"The Dog ran for a touchdown at home plate"
syntactically, that sentence is correct., Semantically, it is gibberish.
That is how syntax is related to semantics.... IE, not very tightly.




Member since:
2005-08-08
> The question really is semantics. It seems to me that Eiffel hails from the same side of the language debate as Pascal, and honestly, in this day of highly dynamic languages like Ruby, Python, and even Objective-C becoming popular, do we really need to retread that old road?
Hum... I find it easier to understand the semantics of static languages compared to very dynamic or abstract languages.
And syntax and semantics ARE very related to each other.