Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 26th Nov 2005 17:02 UTC, submitted by Megatux
Gnome "I followed the debate about a successor for the C/C++ combination as the primary language for developing the GNOME core desktop platform very closely last month. There has been discussion about a number of options. What I would like to do on this page is give an overview how a probably less well-known language might be a viable compromise as a C/C++ successor. This language is called Eiffel and exists for over a decade. Eiffel takes the principle of Object-Oriented programming to its extremes and, as a consequence, is a very easy to learn language."
Thread beginning with comment 65031
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
corentin
Member since:
2005-08-08

> The question really is semantics. It seems to me that Eiffel hails from the same side of the language debate as Pascal, and honestly, in this day of highly dynamic languages like Ruby, Python, and even Objective-C becoming popular, do we really need to retread that old road?

Hum... I find it easier to understand the semantics of static languages compared to very dynamic or abstract languages.

And syntax and semantics ARE very related to each other.

Reply Parent Score: 1

modmans2ndcoming Member since:
2005-11-09

related only by the hierarchal structure of language development.

Syntax can be right, but if the semantics are off, you have a logic error.

"The Dog ran for a touchdown at home plate"

syntactically, that sentence is correct., Semantically, it is gibberish.

That is how syntax is related to semantics.... IE, not very tightly.

Reply Parent Score: 2