Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Sep 2018 21:59 UTC
Privacy, Security, Encryption

During preparation for a workshop at DEF CON in August on locating privacy leaks in network traffic, we discovered a number of applications on both iOS and Android that were broadcasting precise location data back to the applications' developers - in some cases in unencrypted formats. Research released late Friday by Sudo Security's Guardian mobile firewall team provided some confirmation to our findings - and demonstrated that many apps are sharing location data with firms that market location data information without the users' knowledge.

Is anyone still surprised by this? Apple was recently also forced to remove one of the most popular apps in the Mac App Store because it turned out to be spyware. The one redeeming feature of closed application stores is that they're safer - if that advantage turns out to be a lot less solid than proponents of walled gardens proclaim, why do we keep insisting on maintaining them?

E-mail Print r 3   7 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 662208
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Tony Swash
by Tony Swash on Tue 11th Sep 2018 08:50 UTC
Tony Swash
Member since:
2009-08-22

The one redeeming feature of closed application stores is that they're safer - if that advantage turns out to be a lot less solid than proponents of walled gardens proclaim, why do we keep insisting on maintaining them?


The one redeeming feature of the police, an organised group of armed people given special powers to detain and question other people, is that they're make our communities safer - if crimes are still committed, why do we keep insisting on maintaining them?

Reply Score: 0

RE: Comment by Tony Swash
by Gargyle on Wed 12th Sep 2018 13:54 in reply to "Comment by Tony Swash"
Gargyle Member since:
2015-03-27

False analogy, because police's sole reason for existence is to protect the people.

An app market walled garden's sole reason for existence is to protect the economic interests of the app markets owner, not to protect the people that use it - at least not as a direct reason, you can raise the argument that it's an indirect reason because people are more likely to leave if you can't guarantee their protection, but in case of (quasi-)monopolies that's not really happening, so they can just do whatever they want.

Reply Parent Score: 2