Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Dec 2005 16:32 UTC, submitted by Valour
Linux "There is a lot of confusing information about the GNU/Linux operating system, open source and free software, and related issues in the press today. Many of these technologies and concepts are difficult to understand because they deviate from the standard historical traditions of the software industry. There are also a number of sponsored reports and other corporate propaganda published around the Web that smear the image of Linux and free software. In the interest of making a few basic concepts clear, this article will bring light to the darkness perpetuated by uninformed journalists, campaigning CEOs, and misleading advertisements."
Thread beginning with comment 75720
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Modded down?
by on Tue 20th Dec 2005 00:02 UTC in reply to "RE: Modded down?"

Member since:

I made that comment in this context: about the only place this debate between Linux vs. Windows takes place in such a heated manner is the US. It seems (anecdotally, anyway) that Microsoft has its hooks in the deepest here in the States. That's not to say that no one else cares about Microsoft's dubious business practices. But we in the US seem to have the most difficult time getting an Intel-based (non Apple) computer without Windows preinstalled. Also, in this country, a great many people seem to have broadband Internet access, perhaps more than anywhere else in the world. Again, this is all anecdotal, and I have no evidence to support my supposition. It also seems that a lot of emphasis and assumption, between software updates for all platforms and online music and video services, is being placed on broadband connectivity. It was with all that in mind that I made that comment.

Having said that, I don't know where you get the idea that the Linux community is trying to anchor itself specifically in the dial-up market. Just the act alone of downloading an ISO to try out any distibution precludes a dial-up Internet connection. So if we're going to talk about Linux, vs. Windows, we must also take for granted that the modern use of a computer almost requires broadband access. I really think you modded me down without thinking.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[3]: Modded down?
by CodeMonkey on Wed 21st Dec 2005 17:10 in reply to "RE[2]: Modded down?"
CodeMonkey Member since:
2005-09-22

I didn't mod you down actually. I was merely responding to why someone else may have. I personally felt it was fine, but I could see where someone else may have felt otherwise.

As far as Linux anchoring itself in the dial-up markt, that's not quite what I meant. I meant that the Linux community is trying to anchor themselves in developing nations which are just beginning to care about IT on a government level.

From my brief and not so thorough research the only numbers I could find were from 2003 but they are rather significant indeed:
Broadband users: 38,957,000
Narrowband users: 69,647,000
One may safely assume that by 2005 the ration has shifted from 4:7 closer to 1:1. (just a guestamate)

And that's just for the US. I know developing nations will have a much lower percentage of broadband users.

P.S. The edit was simply to fix some typos

Edited 2005-12-21 17:17

Reply Parent Score: 1