Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 17th Dec 2005 23:44 UTC, submitted by Lazarus
Thread beginning with comment 75879
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
ZFS is not an *advantage* as such because it is available
on another system.
Sure it may be an advantage for DFBSD + ZFS versus Linux + something worse, but if you're talking about innovation
and advantages of DFBSD project then ZFS is not so interesting.
Now if you can do something with DFBSD + ZFS that you
cannot do with Solaris, that too would be interesting.
I fail to really see how LWKT (lightweight kernel
threads?) is a basis for SSI...