Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 4th Jan 2006 12:45 UTC
Windows "Microsoft set out to adopt a formal and rigid support lifecycle in 2002, back at a time when most analysts were expecting to see Windows Vista within a couple of years. My own point of view was that this lifecycle business had a lot to do with Microsoft's then-new volume licensing scheme, which among other things is oriented towards selling software subscriptions. If you're buying a subscription for software, you can see how lifecycle plans become important. However, delays in Windows Vista coupled with a questionable approach to 'consumer' products means that 2007 will carry a few surprises unless policy changes are made at Redmond."
Thread beginning with comment 81540
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Extraordinary
by dylansmrjones on Wed 4th Jan 2006 13:55 UTC in reply to "RE: Extraordinary"
dylansmrjones
Member since:
2005-10-02

Less than a year to switch to Vista, if Vista is released this year ;)

EDIT: Another option would be to migrate to XP Pro (which seems to have it's lifespan extended) or Win2K3 Server (the latter one has some drawbacks for desktop use though - at least for ordinary users).

Edited 2006-01-04 13:57

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Extraordinary
by Resolution on Wed 4th Jan 2006 14:07 in reply to "RE[2]: Extraordinary"
Resolution Member since:
2005-11-14

There should have been only 1 "fully-equipped" XP version to begin with.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Extraordinary
by Lazarus on Wed 4th Jan 2006 14:14 in reply to "RE[3]: Extraordinary"
Lazarus Member since:
2005-08-10

Agreed.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Extraordinary
by Kroc on Wed 4th Jan 2006 14:21 in reply to "RE[3]: Extraordinary"
Kroc Member since:
2005-11-10

You'll be pleased to know then that Vista will come in 9 flavours.
http://winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_editions.asp

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Extraordinary
by vondur on Wed 4th Jan 2006 15:44 in reply to "RE[2]: Extraordinary"
vondur Member since:
2005-07-07

Whoa, Microsoft would probably love for everyone to replace their Windows XP Home with Win 2k3 server, but I doubt most people that use home would consider using a server OS as their desktop.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Extraordinary
by dylansmrjones on Wed 4th Jan 2006 19:17 in reply to "RE[3]: Extraordinary"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

Actually they ought to - if they can handle the drawbacks. Not all applications work on Win2K3 Server. And it's expensive if you cannot get it through the MSDN AA.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[3]: Extraordinary
by kaixo on Thu 5th Jan 2006 10:50 in reply to "RE[2]: Extraordinary"
kaixo Member since:
2006-01-05

if you have enought money for W2k3 ok.
but if you are thinking to change for pirate version grong.
PD:escusme my english

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[4]: Extraordinary
by dylansmrjones on Thu 5th Jan 2006 12:12 in reply to "RE[3]: Extraordinary"
dylansmrjones Member since:
2005-10-02

I don't see anyone talking about using piracy software.

You have to pay for Windows 2003 Server. Using piracy software is illegal as well as a potential security threat. Those two elements ought to make people think twice (I know they don't, but they ought to at the very least).

Personally I could get it for free legally through MSDN AA. But not all are that lucky - if it's luck to be using Windows. I don't think so ;)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1