Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 10th Jan 2006 18:45 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 84345
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: What people have failed to notice is...
by RenatoRam on Wed 11th Jan 2006 07:23
in reply to "RE[4]: What people have failed to notice is..."
You don't seem to have got what happened: IBM decided to stop spending millions of cash to do custom development for a _small_ and _niche_ customer that afterwards whined all the time and never bought the promised volumes.
So Apple had to choose another chip. Simple as that.
But Apple will never admit it.
RE[6]: What people have failed to notice is...
by spook on Wed 11th Jan 2006 08:25
in reply to "RE[5]: What people have failed to notice is..."






Member since:
2005-11-15
apple was forced to go intel? WTF? How would that work? You have anything to back this claim up? How can intel force Apple to do anything? This makes no sense...
The switch was 1) economies of scale - intel motherboards are commodities 2) IBM couldn't make a low wattage, fast laptop chip. Intel does.