Linked by on Wed 1st Feb 2006 19:53 UTC
Novell and Ximian A demonstration of the next release of Novell's Linux for desktops drew cheers and applause Wednesday, although the final version of the software is not expected for some months. Nat Friedman, the company's vice president of Linux desktop engineering, showed Novell Linux Desktop 10 playing videos and MP3 music files, and exchanging music and photos with an iPod and a digital camera, in a keynote presentation at the Solutions Linux conference and trade show on the outskirts of Paris.
Thread beginning with comment 92290
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Looks....
by kaiwai on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 02:06 UTC
kaiwai
Member since:
2005-07-06

It looks like another example of a company who have made alot of effort to make Linux a great desktop operating system - the only let down, like all those who have tried and failed to get Linux on the desktop, the complete and utter lack of software from the Adobes, Corels, Macromedias and Quickens of the world.

Like I keep saying, there is nothing actually holding Linux back as a desktop operating system - all things being equal, if all the software on Windows suddenly became available for Linux (or some other UNIX like operating system), Windows wouldn't stand a chance BUT the fact remains, people choose their operating system based on what software can run on top of it.

Now sure, I could, if I wanted to, switch over and use KOffice, Quanta+ and a few other goodies from the OSS community BUT for the vast majority of end users out there, they like the software they have, they've spent time learning how to navigate it, they've got files save in that format, and they would rather stick with what they know - Linux in a nutshell is a no-go until that piece of software arrives on Linux from that paticular vendor.

Reply Score: 1

RE: Looks....
by Lumbergh on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 12:42 in reply to "Looks...."
Lumbergh Member since:
2005-06-29

Like I keep saying, there is nothing actually holding Linux back as a desktop operating system - all things being equal, if all the software on Windows suddenly became available for Linux (or some other UNIX like operating system), Windows wouldn't stand a chance BUT the fact remains, people choose their operating system based on what software can run on top of it.

And that's why Mono should be an official part of Gnome, so that those future apps (ALL Windows apps will be .NET targeted eventually) can at least give developers a fighting chance to port it without too much grief. But we can only assume that RedHat will do its best to keep the linux desktop a failure at any substantial market penetration

And then you get the whole KDE/Gnome fighting and it's no wonder that Microsoft laughs to the bank.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Looks....
by kaiwai on Fri 3rd Feb 2006 18:42 in reply to "RE: Looks...."
kaiwai Member since:
2005-07-06

1) Use of .NET as a framework for building applications is a LONG way off - look how long it took for the transition from win16 to win32, some companies were still shipping win16 applications right up until the beginning of 2000!

2) KDE already has almost every bit of the technology laid out, hence my comfusion as to why people still scream GNOME - someone NEEDS to purchase Trolltech and make Qt completely opensource under something like BSDL or CDDL, something that is nice 'n commercial friendly.

3) (Not directly bought up by you, but I'll address it anyway) Although there is WINE out there, do we really want to enter into a situation where software companies simply avoid brining native applications to Linux or UNIX in geneal because, "oh well, it works just as good on WINE" - thus opening up a rather large quagmire.

Reply Parent Score: 1