Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 97579
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-16
Hi,
what are these complains all about?
We have a problem to get solved:
* X is slow, pain in the ass slow, f--kING SLOW! (this is mostly due to all the data to be flown between client and server on every f--king window moving over another, menu popping up and so on)
* NOT using the GPU for graphical(!) output is a shame, yes a shame! And it is not possible with current X
We have two possible solutions:
* build something on top of something other which is a really evil way of doing it and hope to get further support from hardware vendors to eventually get rid of this stacking
* enhance/modify the existing framework which is clean but breaks compatibility for current drivers
Both solutions have their up- and their downsides. No one can know today which one will work out better.
Both are under open(!) development right now, both in Xorg CVS.
Now let's see which one will work best! There is much shared between them which will help to get an uniform "best" solution.
This is not about taste (unlike KDE vs Gnome), so they won't coexist for a long time. Calm down and feel lucky to not miss one option out on the solution to this really pending problem.
Regards,
Ford Prefect