Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Feb 2006 12:22 UTC, submitted by Rahul
Thread beginning with comment 97674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Not Invented Here
by manmist on Mon 20th Feb 2006 22:00
in reply to "RE[2]: Not Invented Here"
RE[4]: Not Invented Here
by poofyhairguy on Mon 20th Feb 2006 22:17
in reply to "RE[2]: Not Invented Here"
dude. metacity is a window manager. XGL is a X server. You are comparing apples to oranges. Understand what you are testing or trying out atleast.
You know that I was talking about Compiz.
Does not change the fact that the Metacity videos are primative compared to what eye candy I have working on my Ubuntu desktop today. As in right now. Not some magically point in the future.
RE[5]: Not Invented Here
by SlackerJack on Mon 20th Feb 2006 22:28
in reply to "RE[4]: Not Invented Here"






Member since:
2005-07-14
You can continue to believe that code that is already is Xorg cvs is not stable compared to Novell closed development which has undergo no peer review or integration with the primary Xorg project.
I will, because unlike you I have tried both the new Metacity and XGL and XGL is far better and more stable. Long time composite problems are fixed completely by XGL. If you want a list find one here:
http://linuxeyecandy.blogspot.com/
And deal with the fact that behind closed doors at Novell David did better than the rest of the community all put together.