Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Feb 2006 16:26 UTC
This week, one of the most-commented stories on OSNews was the story about how 'Maxxus' cracked/hacked (take your pick) the Intel version of Apple's OSX once again. This sparked a lively debate over whether we should encourage Maxxus, or condemn his actions. I made myself clear from the get-go: I condemn his actions. Note: This is the Sunday Eve Column of the week.
Thread beginning with comment 97870
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
The existence of LGPL proves that GPL is a EULA.
should read as
The existence of LGPL proves that GPL is effectively a EULA.
***
Anyways ... I woke too early and posted too much before drinking coffee. I apologize for both the quantity as well as lack of clarity in my posts. 
Does the existance of the CDDL prove that the GPL was effectively having an affair with the MPL? Because that line of reasoning makes about us much sense as your LGPL proves the GPL is a EULA argument.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-01-17
The existence of LGPL proves that GPL is a EULA.
should read as
The existence of LGPL proves that GPL is effectively a EULA.
***
Anyways ... I woke too early and posted too much before drinking coffee. I apologize for both the quantity as well as lack of clarity in my posts.