Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 27th Feb 2006 17:08 UTC, submitted by Nehru
Thread beginning with comment 99717
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I wonder what this is all about
by Tweek on Mon 27th Feb 2006 23:45
in reply to "I wonder what this is all about"
RE[2]: I wonder what this is all about
by modmans2ndcoming on Tue 28th Feb 2006 02:51
in reply to "RE: I wonder what this is all about"
RE[2]: I wonder what this is all about
by Ford Prefect on Tue 28th Feb 2006 12:17
in reply to "RE: I wonder what this is all about"
This is not true. In times of the 386, 486 processors Intel had the problem of Noname-competitors like AMD who brought in some "compatible" processors which weren't as performant as the original ones.
This lead Intel to start a branding like "Pentium", as it wasn't only a number so others couldn't call their processors the same.
Others started to bring out "586" processors or AMD the K5. It wasn't as good as the Pentium, floating point lacked a lot in performance compared to the Pentium!
Even the K6 was still behind Intel. One have to say that it also was much cheaper. 





Member since:
2006-01-16
Chip design is difficult and we've seen many false announcements and expectations before.
"Lack of evolution and innovation" is just what happened to Intel the last years, which made AMD getting the lead. So if one expects AMD with much less ressources, a difficult competition against Intel as marketleader, and so on, will hold the leading position forever, this is just hilarous.
So it's just AMD did a very, very good job, and perhaps does a good job as well nowadays, but intel just got to do something about it and did. And finally will catch up again, for sure.