OpenAI beta tests SearchGPT search engine

Normally I’m not that interested in reporting on news coming from OpenAI, but today is a little different – the company launched SearchGPT, a search engine that’s supposed to rival Google, but at the same time, they’re also kind of not launching a search engine that’s supposed to rival Google. What?

We’re testing SearchGPT, a prototype of new search features designed to combine the strength of our AI models with information from the web to give you fast and timely answers with clear and relevant sources. We’re launching to a small group of users and publishers to get feedback. While this prototype is temporary, we plan to integrate the best of these features directly into ChatGPT in the future. If you’re interested in trying the prototype, sign up for the waitlist.

↫ OpenAI website

Basically, before adding a more traditional web-search like feature set to ChatGPT, the company is first breaking them out into a separate, temporary product that users can test, before parts of it will be integrated into OpenAI’s main ChatGPT product. It’s an interesting approach, and with just how stupidly popular and hyped ChatGPT is, I’m sure they won’t have any issues assembling a large enough pool of testers.

OpenAI claims SearchGPT will be different from, say, Google or AltaVista, by employing a conversation-style interface with real-time results from the web. Sources for search results will be clearly marked – good – and additional sources will be presented in a sidebar. True to the ChatGPT-style user interface, you can keep “talking” after hitting a result to refine your search further.

I may perhaps betray my still relatively modest age, but do people really want to “talk” to a machine to search the web? Any time I’ve ever used one of these chatbot-style user interfaces -including ChatGPT – I find them cumbersome and frustrating, like they’re just adding an obtuse layer between me and the computer, and that I’d rather just be instructing the computer directly. Why try and verbally massage a stupid autocomplete into finding a link to an article I remember from a few days ago, instead of just typing in a few quick keywords?

I am more than willing to concede I’m just out of touch with what people really want, so maybe this really is the future of search. I hope I can just always disable nonsense like this and just throw keywords at the problem.

21 Comments

  1. 2024-07-25 7:49 pm
  2. 2024-07-26 12:01 am
    • 2024-07-27 3:29 am
  3. 2024-07-26 2:37 am
  4. 2024-07-26 4:56 am
  5. 2024-07-26 6:22 am
  6. 2024-07-26 6:25 am
    • 2024-07-26 11:55 am
      • 2024-07-26 12:14 pm
        • 2024-07-27 9:33 am
          • 2024-07-27 1:54 pm
  7. 2024-07-26 10:29 am
    • 2024-07-27 2:29 pm
      • 2024-07-27 3:06 pm
  8. 2024-07-26 1:02 pm
  9. 2024-07-26 7:07 pm
    • 2024-07-28 2:16 am
    • 2024-07-28 11:55 am
  10. 2024-07-28 6:33 am
    • 2024-07-28 4:51 pm