“Immediately after the release of new Virtual Infrastructure 3, Virtualization.info had the pleasure to reach Raghu Raghuram, Vice President of Platform Products at VMware, to ask him details about the just launched products, the recent Akimbi acquisition announcement, the secret VMware Integrity product, a planned presence in the Apple operating system, and further steps in the virtualization market leader’s strategy. From his answers a revelation came out: VMware is going to partially support Microsoft’svirtualization technologies.”
VMWare would be very welcome on the Mac platform, their Windows client is a first class program with excellent workflow tools. MS virtual server simply does not compare.
MS virtual server simply does not compare.
Why not?
MS virtual server simply does not compare.
Why did you vote down my post? I was asking you to explain why not. That doesn’t deserve a negative vote. Or do you simply not want to explain your comment?
VMware as an integrated part of Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard)
rubbish!
leapard may include virtualisation, but it is very unlikely to be vmware, more likely to be a wine-esque solution by apple.
parallels works on macosx and is being plugged by apple.
virtualpc worked on macosx before microsoft bought it.
vmware on macosx is still not even in beta testing.
OSX has devolved into just another x86 OS. I don’t see why VMware wouldn’t be able to support it either as guest or host.
Seems to me like stating the obvious.
im willing to bet it has to do with legalities. apple most assuredly doesn’t want their OS running on anything but their hardware (says so in the eula, yes, yeeech, eula..), and whilst it may be legal in ones own country to bypass a EULA, in the states it isn’t, and that’s a big market.
and i doubt vmware would be to keen on taking on apple legal. just wouldn’t be worth it.
There are two separate issues here: running VMware on OS X, which Apple should have no objection to, and running OS X on Vmware, which Apple would probably object to unless it is done very carefully. Mac software developers would probably benefit greatly from running OS X on VMware/Parallels on OS X, so hopefully Apple, VMware, and Parallels can work something out.
“and i doubt vmware would be to keen on taking on apple legal. just wouldn’t be worth it.”
Oh, dunno. EMC’s legal department would probably make a nice sparring partner. VMware is part of EMC, remember? Maybe some patent swap, or under the table swapping of licenses, and everything would be all fine and dandy again.
This does raise an interesting point. When developing software and working with computers, its common that creating save points of desktops in software development is a great feature of VMware workstation. Because of Apple’s protection schemes, its impossible to do this AFAIK and is a feature that will be reserved for Linux and Windows. I love using VMware on Linux
i love their workstation and server (gsx and esx) products. parallels doesn’t hold a candle to vmware.
I like how they pretty much don’t talk about Vmware Server (GSX) anymore. Since becoming free, all they care about now is ESX and big industry implementations. I manage our GSX infrastructure and I am still waiting for Server to come out of Beta, even their product pages push you away from Server towards ESX. Some of us don’t want to spend a few thousand dollars on ESX (we just spent 1400 on GSX a month before it went free, grr).
As for OSX, Leopard will not have virtualization built in, just the final version of BootCamp. Though I can’t decide if I should spend the 40 bucks to get Parallels before the 15th, or wait for VMware..
But VMware Server 1.0 it is out of beta. RC2 was released yesterday.