Submitted by “One of the main benefits of an open source WebKit is allowing developers to download nightly browser builds from the WebKit Open Source Project page. Nightly builds allow you as a developer to prepare for changes before they wind up on your users’ desktops. This article describes how you can leverage WebKit nightly builds to determine how changes in the framework may affect your web content, Dashboard widgets, or WebKit-based application in future versions of Mac OS X.”
…(non-development comment, btw) because it is very fast and has all the features of Safari… but it is a bit unstable from night to night (not always in the same way). I use it for a week, get tired of crashes, then go back to Camino, then try Omniweb again, then go back to Camino… Right now I am trying Flock – likely will go back to Camino…
Sounds like an add for Camino. It’s not. Camino has bugs too (of course I use cutting edge nightly builds of Camino as well). I cannot put my finger on it, but something about Camino just works for me. But if you want speed, WebKit is definitely faster than Camino.
This isn’t exactly on target. As a Linux user I am accustomed to frequent updates, but they do break things on occassion. I am also a Mac user. I love OS X…really don’t like safari. I too tried camino….OK, not great. Haven’t tried Flock.. I have been using Opera. I am falling in love with Opera…keep going back to it. I like Firefox on windows, but on OS X Opera Rocks. Give it a try.