> Timeline of Zeta Developments
Timeline of Zeta Developments
A lot of things have happened in the past few days concerning Zeta, BeOS, and Haiku. In order to create some order in the chaos, Eugenia and I have created a rough timeline of what happened the past 6-7 years. Read on for the timeline and some more thoughts on the matter. Update: Magnusoft ceases distribution of Zeta. Update II: Access answered the questions posed in the article.So now, we can reconstruct fragments of the BeOS saga over the past seven years – with the help of Eugenia, that is. Eugenia is no new comer to the BeOS world (before OSNews she was running BeNews) and she has met Bernd Korz several times.
So. It’s 2001. Be, Inc. is in talks with a German company (Koch Media, more here) to grant them distribution rights of BeOS 5 in Germany and the rest of Europe. Eugenia does not know if these talks were ever finished, nor does she know if anything finalized got signed (although some draft contracts could have been signed). Eventually, YellowTAB buys that contract from that company.
Not much later, Be goes belly up, and sells its assets to Palmsource.
Bernd Korz and YellowTAB start work on Zeta – something they are not allowed to do as far as the distribution rights go, since they only have distribution rights of BeOS 5, and nothing more. Debate immediately arises in the BeOS community about Zeta’s legality. Especially the code leaked in early 2002 fuels speculation that Zeta is based on this illegal leak.
Now, Eugenia tells me that Bernd Korz went to America a few times to contact Palmsource but a number of times they not only declined to talk to him but he also became a running joke within Palmsource’s ex-Be engineers and executives (who for some reason did not like seeing BeOS resurrected via another company — some of them saw Haiku the same way too). Bernd eventually did meet Jean-Louis Gassee (who was a Palmsource board member at the time) to discuss the matter but we don’t know what ever happened after their meeting.
In the meantime, Palmsource is acquired by Access. Access is now the owner of Be’s IP.
In this role as owner, they say to have sent numerous cease and desist letters to YellowTAB, on the grounds that Zeta is “an unauthorized derivative work”. Access does not contact any news outlet, nor does it give out any press releases. The cease and desist letters go unanswered.
In the meantime, YellowTAB starts pushing up the daisies as sales have been very poor. Magnussoft takes over development of Zeta. They provide Bernd Korz with 5 people, and some funding to develop Zeta. All seems well at this point.
On 23rd March this year, Bernd Korz and his team part ways with Magnussoft. A few days later, Bernd announces he quits Zeta development altogether.
Today, we have Access stating that “if Herr Korz feels that he holds a legitimate license to the BeOS code he’s been using, we’re completely unaware of it, and I’d be fascinated to see him produce any substantiation for that claim.”
In a response, Bernd states on his weblog that he will be talking to his lawyer, and that a statement will be made soon.
This short timeline elicits a few interesting questions. Why did Palmsource decline to talk with Bernd Korz? Why did Palmsource never take any legal action against YellowTAB (that we know of)? Why has Access been so secretive about their actions against Zeta? Why did they choose a comments’ section on a news site to speak in public about this for the first time? Are the recent talks between Access and Haiku a mere coincidence? (update: The recent release of the BeBook/docs was after Jorge G. Mare (a.k.a. Koki) asked for it from Access.)
It seems that 6 years after its demise, the BeOS can still stir the operating system world up. Let us hope everything gets cleared up sooner rather than later.
About The Author
Follow me on Twitter @thomholwerda
Those questions have already been answered time and again in multiple posts in the previous articles.
1) They had no interest in selling BeOS/giving rights to BeOS. Why waste time if there is no intention to ever part with the source?
2) I’ve stated it a billion times. Legal reasons. It did not behoove ACCESS to make public statements concerning Zeta, as it would have cost them far more than they could have ever gotten out of it. Simple economics/business.
3) English errors not withstanding, see #2.
4) Why not? They didn’t feel it merited front page exposure on their website, “Lefty” was trying to avoid negativity on ACCESS’s pages, etc. There are surely a million reasons.
[Edit: The above are just some possible reasons. I am not speaking on “Lefty”‘s behalf, only suggesting some possibilities/logical reasons – of which there are MANY.]
5) From what I understand, the talks have been ongoing, and ACCESS has always been cooperative with Haiku.
What exactly is the point of this “timeline” and commentary? Another defense in disguise? That’s what it sounds like. If you’re attempting to bring the “other side of the story” to light, you might have wanted to wait until Bernd’s official statement is out, joke as it might be.
Edited 2007-04-04 21:52 UTC