Well, it’s a bit of a Microsoft day today, for better or worse. In any case, the European Commission has announced that it will scale back its monitoring of Microsoft. According to the EC, Microsoft has made progress in complying with the 2004 Statement of Objections – in fact, the company has already provided all the necessary documentation required by the EC’s ruling.
The statement, released by the EC this morning, explains that “in light of changes in Microsoft’s behaviour, the increased opportunity for third parties to exercise their rights directly before national courts and experience gained since the adoption of the 2004 Decision, the Commission no longer requires a full time monitoring trustee to assess Microsoft’s compliance.” They added that “in future, the Commission intends to rely on the ad hoc assistance of technical consultants.”
The EC further explains that the interoperability information Microsoft had to publish has all been released, and as such, direct monitoring is no longer required. The really juicy part of the statement is the wording: “the original set of interoperability information has already been documented by Microsoft”. This is the first official admission from the EC that Microsoft has complied with its ruling – and apparently, it did so in the past.
In any case, this is of course separate from the whole Internet Explorer issue the EC is currently investigating, which Microsoft might thwart by allowing users to remove the browser from Windows in Windows 7.
I mean, come on — this is Microsoft we’re talking about!
It would be interesting to have some comments from one of the open source projects that is building software based on these interoperability documents – Samba, for example.
That would truly be the yardstick by which one can measure whether Microsoft has really complied.
It’s too easy to pile pages upon pages of useless crap.
I believe they’ve already recieved and released the full specs for Samba/CIFS based on the agreement a year or more ago. There was a big spike in Samba related news articles and it’s interoperability seemed to improve over night.
I think the basic idea is about right though. Let’s hear from the competitors that must now develop interoperable programs based on the provided specs. If it’s all god; about F’ing time, we can all move on finally.