VLC for Mac’s Future in Danger, More Developers Needed

MacNN has just published an important news item regarding the future of the Mac OS X version of the VLC mdia player. According to VLC’s developers, the Mac version is at risk of being discontinued due to a lack of developers. Update: The VLC developers claim that Apple is working against them: “Apple doesn’t want us on the Mac platform and is blocking us a lot, and refuses to explain why.”

MacNN reports that development of the 64bit version of VLC for Mac OS X has already been halted. VLC being a volunteer project, you can already guess the problem: a lack of developers. If new developers do not come to the rescue, VLC 1.1.0 will be the last Mac OS X version of VLC. Apparently, the project no longer has any Mac developers at all.

VLC is an important application on the Mac, as I don’t know any Mac user who does not have it installed. QuickTime Player is relatively limited in its coded support, and despite the fact that ‘codec packs’ exist for QT, VLC is a very popular alternative.

The project is asking for more developers, and as a Mac and VLC user myself, I felt it was important to use OSNews to possibly get people interested in helping out the VLC project. I’d hate to see VLC for the Mac disappear due to a lack of developers. And yes, I just used the word developers 8 9 times.

46 Comments

  1. CrLf 2009-12-17 12:42 am EST
    • chekr 2009-12-17 1:13 am EST
    • ple_mono 2009-12-17 1:26 am EST
      • kaiwai 2009-12-17 1:53 am EST
    • iaefai 2009-12-17 4:44 am EST
    • Shannara 2009-12-17 9:34 pm EST
  2. SuperDaveOsbourne 2009-12-17 1:22 am EST
    • Tuishimi 2009-12-17 4:03 am EST
    • mlankton 2009-12-17 2:55 pm EST
      • dacresni 2009-12-17 3:34 pm EST
      • WereCatf 2009-12-17 4:43 pm EST
        • mlankton 2009-12-17 5:01 pm EST
      • phoenix 2009-12-18 6:02 am EST
  3. ozonehole 2009-12-17 2:07 am EST
    • tyrione 2009-12-17 2:23 am EST
    • Praxis 2009-12-17 2:25 am EST
    • hornett 2009-12-17 4:50 am EST
    • cb_osn 2009-12-17 6:23 am EST
      • strcpy 2009-12-17 7:30 am EST
        • WereCatf 2009-12-17 8:06 am EST
      • danieldk 2009-12-17 9:25 am EST
    • krreagan 2009-12-17 3:13 pm EST
    • BluenoseJake 2009-12-17 4:21 pm EST
  4. leos 2009-12-17 3:22 am EST
  5. eksasol 2009-12-17 5:05 am EST
    • daveak 2009-12-17 8:12 am EST
    • werpu 2009-12-17 12:05 pm EST
  6. darwinOS 2009-12-17 7:09 am EST
    • moondevil 2009-12-17 8:10 am EST
    • darknexus 2009-12-17 9:02 am EST
  7. Mellin 2009-12-17 10:46 am EST
    • KugelKurt 2009-12-17 3:57 pm EST
      • boldingd 2009-12-17 4:28 pm EST
  8. mmu_man 2009-12-17 11:34 am EST
  9. HAL2001 2009-12-17 2:30 pm EST
    • Luminair 2009-12-17 4:25 pm EST
      • darknexus 2009-12-17 6:01 pm EST
        • dagw 2009-12-17 6:33 pm EST
        • Vanger 2009-12-17 7:56 pm EST
  10. siraf72 2009-12-17 4:59 pm EST
  11. rajan r 2009-12-17 6:07 pm EST
    • siraf72 2009-12-17 6:25 pm EST
    • darknexus 2009-12-17 6:31 pm EST
  12. jweinraub 2009-12-17 7:33 pm EST
    • Praxis 2009-12-17 9:22 pm EST
  13. ioctl 2009-12-17 8:44 pm EST