There are two reasons for this news item. First, I want this issue resolved. Second, it allows me to post the most awesome picture ever and ever. The story is simple. Mojang, the company behind the immensely successful Minecraft, is working on a second game called ‘Scrolls’, which has been in development for a while now. As it turns out, Bethesda has sent a cease and desist notice to Mojang – they claim ‘Scrolls’ infringes on ‘The Elder Scrolls’ trademark. As a fan of both Minecraft and Bethesda, this is just silly.
As Notch, Minecraft’s creator, also states, this probably has very little to do with Bethesda’s developers. Considering the fact that Bethesda’s game director Todd Howard and Notch even interviewed each other at E3, I’m assuming the developers had no idea about this – this is probably the lawyer department.
Fact remains, the issue is real. It didn’t pop up out of nowhere though; six months ago, Mojang filed a trademark for ‘Scrolls’, and this drew the attention of Bethesda’s lawyers. They claimed it conflicted with their The Elder Scrolls trademark, but Mojang studied the whole situation and realised Bethesda didn’t have much of a case. Still, Mojang went out of their way to suggest a compromise.
“We suggested a compromise where we’d agree to never put any words in front of ‘Scrolls’, and instead call sequels and other things something along the lines of ‘Scrolls – The Banana Expansion’,” Notch details, “I’m not sure if they ever got back to us with a reply to this.”
Well, they did, but not in the way Notch expected. “Today, I got a 15 page letter from some Swedish lawyer firm, saying they demand us to stop using the name Scrolls, that they will sue us (and have already paid the fee to the Swedish court), and that they demand a pile of money up front before the legal process has even started,” Notch states.
It’s an odd situation. I’m a massive Bethesda fan, and even though I’m able to glitch Fallout 3 or New Vegas within 45 seconds from any location on the map, I always greatly enjoy their games. In fact, in my mind, the entirety of 2011 so far has been nothing but an annoyingly long and boring run-up to November 11 when Skyrim comes out. So, seeing Bethesda pull a Langdell is really disconcerting.
From QuickMeme
Fix this, Bethesda.
Such as threatening not to buy Skyrim if Bethesda remains an ass? I understand that Microsoft, Apple and Oracle are too big to be affected by moves like this, but I would imagine a game company maintains closer ties to its customers (esp. since piracy is a much bigger problem for them)?
Or maybe we can ask Chaosium to go after Bethesda because of the word “elder”…
Edited 2011-08-06 09:07 UTC
I thought the ‘Edge’ lawsuit would have settled idiotic claims like this.
I guess the legal department needs something to do, but it doesn’t seem they could possibly win it, particularly given how that trademark suit turned out. Not to mention that the court suggested that trolling on a name like that could warrant criminal penalties in that particular case.
Looks like nothing but an extortion attempt.
Anyway, I don’t see how “Scrolls” infringes upon “The Elder Scrolls”. Otherwise, we would have never seen “Adventures” in more than one game title, or “Life” because “Half-Life” exists.
Or “Half-Life” because “Life” exists.
It’s pretty clear that this is an idea from ZeniMax Media, not Bethesda Softworks.
Valve Corporation, the creators of the “half-life” game series was today sued by the Milton Bradley Company.
According to MBC, who brought the lawsuit into court in the Eastern District of Texas, the game is in infringement with the company’s well known IP of The Game of Life.
During a press conference earlier today, the company CEO for the first time commented the lawsuit by saying “we can sit by and watch competitors steal our invented words, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it. We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original words, or preferably use a whole another language, not steal ours.”
I wish buying up and laying off lawyers (or their companies) would work. Bah.
Sorry, posted to the wrong thread.
Edited 2011-08-07 02:08 UTC
I read the story and agree that their claim is baseless however I can’t help that feel that Thom is arguing that this is supposedly another example of craziness that is the entire patent system.
This isn’t indicative of any supposed larger problem but rather a company who is simply over reaching with their patent in hopes of getting some free money by using scare tactics towards a smaller developer.
I’ve come to grow especially larry of any news article on this site relating to patents or really, a company’s ownership of any property that is non-physical.
Edited 2011-08-06 16:53 UTC
Lolwut?
Edited 2011-08-06 17:00 UTC
Well, call me Larry and smoke a cigar, you do not have a clue about patents, marks, and copyright, do you?
I fail to understand why you even bother posting if you’re so upset with Thom’s opinion. Not counting the fact that you obviously completely missed the point as this article has nothing to do with patents, if Thom’s stance on the US’s laws for patents relating to software annoys you so much, why do you bother visiting OSNews (never mind posting)? It seems to me like you might be better off not bothering visiting this site at all. After all, this being the world wide web, I’m sure there’s a countless plethora of other sites that are more than capable of catering to your tastes. Surely you would be better off spending your time reading something that upsets you less because, judging by your past comments, you don’t seem to take too kindly to opinions that don’t aline with your own. Maybe not visiting OSNews would be a good thing for you. Maybe that way your blood pressure would not spike quite so much. I know that I would certainly not miss your less than relevant contributions.
I am writing to inform you that you have infringed upon my trademark for “Especially Larry”, which I filed for as the name of a sitcom starring Laurence Fishbourne I’m looking to get off the ground.
At your earliest convenience, please empty out your bank account; I’ll send someone over to your house in the next day or so to pick up the funds. I would suggest also having a sandwich made as a precaution. Gunther can be somewhat aggressive if he’s got an empty stomach.
I certainly would not confuse elder scrolls with another scrolls title.
I guess from Zeni-Max’s perspective the fear is that a noobie customer only hearing a grapevine reference to a great scrolls game would google “scrolls” that would let him unintentionally to buy the wrong game leaving them out of pocket. I hardly think that this would happen so often that it warrant such a case though.
On the legal merits (not necessarily just merits) of the case i don’t know. If for instance Zeni-Max copyrighted variations on the title, for instance not only “Oblivion: Elder Scrolls” but also “Elder Scrolls”, “Scrolls RPG”, “Scrolls game” it might not be so clear cut.
Edited 2011-08-06 17:31 UTC
This is clearly a legitimate trademark infringement claim. Same industry, hell same genre.
Really, get over it. These guys didn’t even consider trademarks before applying for and advertising this game.
The word “scrolls” in a genre about medieval themed RPGs? You’ve got to be kidding me.
I have a copyright over any words ending by “oll”.
You are therefore warned that you must stop being a troll. I will sue you. Pay me 100000$ right now or else.
Is that like how The Elder Scrolls infringes on the game The Scroll, which came out 2 years before the first Elder game?
p0wned!!
Maybe someone should mention that little fact to Bethesda?
Hey it worked for Blizzard! They sent the Cease and Desist to FreeCraft, because of Course FreeCraft and StarCraft and WarCraft are all so much alike.
What happened with that? Well FreeCraft changed their name to Stratagus and now all is well in the Blizzard universe.. (???)
Not even sure how Minecraft (it didn’t capitalize the C?) got away with a craft in it’s name without the Blizzard hounds (lawyers). But now Scrolls and Elder Scrolls are so confusing… aren’t they?
Horrible stupidity this all is…
FreeCraft is a clone of WarCraft, Minecraft is not related to any blizzard game. That’s probably why.
I agree that there is a lot of abuse of the legal system over trademarks, patents, and copyrights. However, it also seems to me that this situation is wildly over simplified and the over simplification may do more harm than good.
The thing is, you have people who will abuse trademarks that they own to suppress or blackmail others. You also have people who want to ride on other people’s trademarks in order to make a quick buck. I don’t know these people so I don’t know if that’s what’s going on here, but that’s the type of nonsense that happens out there and sometimes people get self-rightous about their claims because they suspect that the other side is out to screw them.
As for this case, it looks like both sides are fighting over very similar names for a fantasy RPG. And while the fight includes a common word, especially in the genre, the word isn’t so common as to make the potential infringement a non-issue.
Some think you can’t trademark one English word. While they’re technically right you can, if you have enough money, corner wide ranging market segments with one word.
On your copyright application you submit a code.
This list of codes is an international drawn up document and an international convention.
Your trademark code will relate to for instance “retail”, “mining”, “paper”, “chemical”, “engineering” ect.
You are permitted just one code with each trademark application.
Let’s take an example. For instance Apple
When Apple lodges an application “Apple computers” you will submit a code relating to electronics.
When the trademark is already taken can contact the holder and enquire whether he would consider selling and cede the trademark.
When they a have a diverse company or suspect future diversifying they also apply additional trademark applications for different industries.
For instance “Apple Entertainment” with a code registered under entertainment services, retail and “Apple Software” with registered under software dev.
Every software, electronics and entertainment company would now not be able to use Apple in their trademark registration.
It is relative cheap to register trademarks and it’s a nightmare finding that right name these days. It’s almost like web domains.
As I remember, there are law in Europe, saying, that you can’t trademark general words, like “bread” or something. Scroll is simple general word, more historic, but it’s yeah, like trademarking word “Life”.
Total nonsense. How can one trademark such a word?