Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th May 2006 21:25 UTC, submitted by luzr
OSNews, Generic OSes Torvalds has indeed chimed in on the micro vs. monolithic kernel debate. Going all 1992, he says: "The whole 'microkernels are simpler' argument is just bull, and it is clearly shown to be bull by the fact that whenever you compare the speed of development of a microkernel and a traditional kernel, the traditional kernel wins. The whole argument that microkernels are somehow 'more secure' or 'more stable' is also total crap. The fact that each individual piece is simple and secure does not make the aggregate either simple or secure. And the argument that you can 'just reload' a failed service and not take the whole system down is equally flawed." My take: While I am not qualified to reply to Linus, there is one thing I want to say: just because it is difficult to program, does not make it the worse design.
Thread beginning with comment 123029
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Gotta Love Linus
by twenex on Wed 10th May 2006 15:18 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Gotta Love Linus"
twenex
Member since:
2006-04-21

Kernels have feelings, too (but perhaps not genders) ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Gotta Love Linus
by AlexandreAM on Wed 10th May 2006 16:12 in reply to "RE[3]: Gotta Love Linus"
AlexandreAM Member since:
2006-02-06

If kernels have no genders I cannot understand how come we ended up with "Hybrid" Kernels...

Gee... Kernel sex is a strange concept...

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[5]: Gotta Love Linus
by twenex on Wed 10th May 2006 16:36 in reply to "RE[4]: Gotta Love Linus"
twenex Member since:
2006-04-21

If kernels DO have genders, do microkernels get PMS?

Reply Parent Score: 1