To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
its quite odd. if you have LPAR, you dont relly 'dual boot' at all.. thats the whole point of LPAR!
If you look at the article you'll see they discuss installing each OS in an LPAR, but only powering on one at a time. In effect dual booting by halting one OS, then powering on the other from the relevant management server. The use of LPARs is incidental here to provide an easy way to dual boot.
I guess the limited resources they are talking about here isn't the number of nodes, but rather the type of node. Eg. a p5 510, which is LPAR capable but on which it would be illadvised to run several partitions at once due to the limited hardware.
The major flaw in this system btw is that you lose the capability to mirror your boot disk, as the other OS is installed on it (we're talking standard 2 disk system). Any sysadmin will tell you this is just an accident waiting to happen. It could work though if the system is non-critical enough (like 1 of n webservers in some sort of load balancing scheme), but why put yourself through the hassle of restoring from backup if a disk fails ? I guess it is meant for testing purposes only.




Member since:
2005-07-06
its quite odd. if you have LPAR, you dont relly 'dual boot' at all.. thats the whole point of LPAR!