Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Aug 2005 09:39 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 13172
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Slackware 10.2 and Kernel 2.6
by slamens on Wed 3rd Aug 2005 14:58
in reply to "RE[6]: Slackware 10.2 and Kernel 2.6"
RE[8]: Slackware 10.2 and Kernel 2.6
by VenomousGecko on Wed 3rd Aug 2005 19:29
in reply to "RE[7]: Slackware 10.2 and Kernel 2.6"
Evolution is one thing but gnucash is quite another. Compiling and building gnucash is a non-trivial matter to say the least seeing as how it is still based on GTK1 and not GTK2. Even if you had a full Gnome installation on Slack, I think you would be in as big of a fight to get gnucash on your system.




Member since:
2005-06-29
Without a gnome distribution included in slackware, no one can create package of gnome-dependent programs for slackware. Say I want to build and distribute a package of program X, should I build it under freerock gnome, dropline gnome or gware?
Good point, but aren't gtk libs etc. still included in /l? Pat still includes gtk apps like gaim and gftp. Maybe what's included isn't enough, though. I've never built packages like what you are suggesting. Just wondering.