Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 25th Jun 2006 22:47 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 137148
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There are so many issues and arguments at hand, ...
I personally am very confused about network neutrality. Almost everything I read about it makes me favor it. I want the internet to be like a sidewalk--no one limits who can walk on it, or when, or where, and no one collects tolls.
But the problem is--most of the politicians who support it, especially those often highlighted at http://www.savetheinternet.com/ seem to be the enemies of freedom on other issues.
I know that that veers into politics, which we studiously avoid here. But apparently network neutrality is a very political issue.






Member since:
2005-12-16
While this article is a nice exercise in creative writing, I think it falls a bit short of offering any supportive evidence that the current draft of net neutrality legislation is right way to go. There are so many issues and arguments at hand, from the US global economic position, to our telecom infrastructure with regard to domestic emergencies and homeland security, to getting broadband access in rural areas (build out reqs), freedom of info, to capitalism in general. Check out the testimonies on cspan, read some info on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality. That's where I'd start. The suggestion that without net netreuality we are doomed to incompatible services and market monopolies seems naive to me. However, as a hypothetical example... yes, I think it seems probable.