Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 23rd Dec 2006 17:45 UTC
X11, Window Managers Apparently, my article a few days ago caused a bigger stir than I had anticipated, not at all unrelated to the fact that my wordings may not have been optimal. So, let me clarify things a bit.
Thread beginning with comment 195747
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Huh?
by Daniel Borgmann on Sat 23rd Dec 2006 21:38 UTC in reply to "RE: Huh?"
Daniel Borgmann
Member since:

But what are you talking about? Nobody is raving about how great GNOME 3 will be and it's never brought up as an excuse when GNOME is to be compared with Vista or OSX. Topaz is purely playground, it's neither used to make GNOME look good, nor should it be used to make GNOME look bad. There is plenty of good innovation that can and will still happen in the 2.x line.

Reply Parent Score: 5