To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"restrictive for whom."
Everybody, developers and users.
"GPL3 makes my life *less* *restrictive* that the point or have you not been keeping up. Seriously you should read about the license."
The GPL v3 doesn't give me the right to decide whether I want use DRM software or not. How is this not a ristriction? Gimme a break...
"
The GPL v3 doesn't give me the right to decide whether I want use DRM software or not. How is this not a ristriction? Gimme a break...
"
WRONG it restricts use on DRM'd hardware like Tivo and (probably Sveasoft's firmware for routers), that stops you from running modifications on it with the source they give. Look up "Tivoization". It has nothing to do with software DRM.
And yes GPL3 does stop the deal with Novell-- isn't that a good thing for the people who chose to license under it? The deal specifically leaves commercial vendors out of their patent blanket and open for suits.





Member since:
2006-03-12
"No other oss license is so restrictive and incompatible with other licenses".
restrictive for whom.
"GPL v3 makes things worse" GPL3 makes my life *less* *restrictive* that the point or have you not been keeping up. Seriously you should read about the license.
"Not even the FSF lawyers seem to fully understand the GPL, even v2."
I'm absolutely certain underlying premise to GPL is really simple...the only debate *ever* is how to get around it.
Edited 2007-01-08 19:33