Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Jan 2007 15:11 UTC, submitted by Torsten Rahn
Thread beginning with comment 203426
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-01-30
It may look strange that the reviewer went as far as using a November 8th cvs release for one indexer and instead used a several months old release of beagle (when a beagle release happened on November 1st). It may not be malice, but just ignorance on his part.
Anyway, beagle had many fixes for memory usage in the releases following 0.2.7 and some more even after November 1st: the actual memory usage of bagle is much lower now.