Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 2nd Feb 2007 11:30 UTC, submitted by anonymous
Thread beginning with comment 208420
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-17
I think portability is deeply important in some spheres, such as the wellspring of POSIX apps that can be built on many platforms (even Windows).
However, I think portability of custom-built business applications is vastly overrated. Not one of my customers has ever cared about it. In that space, what's far more important is interoperability of file formats and protocols. (And many customers don't even care about that, although I personally think it's important.)
Even in the GUI space, when I run a Windows app, I want it to look and run like a Windows app. When I run a Mac app, I want it to have the esthetics of a Mac app. But I also want to be able to exchange information easily between platforms.