To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Read http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=17435&comment_id=218952
http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=17435&comment_id=219099
Franky, other than Microsoft and perhaps Novell, who wants to make a plugin for a format that still does vendor lock-in, has 6000 pages specifications that will take years to read and understand?
Edited 2007-03-07 23:22
Really so the OOXML plug-in for OOo didn't happen and is all vaporware?
Have a read through the OOXML objections, as you've been pointed to on numerous occasions.
Additionally, you seem to have the memory of a goldfish, because it's already been pointed out that the OOXML plugin for Open Office is absolutely nowhere near being complete to a point where it would be of any use. Have a look at the huge amount of work involved, and this is for Microsoft's Mac Office where this should be technically within their reach! :-
http://blogs.msdn.com/rick_schaut/archive/2006/12/07/open-xml-conve...
The objections listed for OOXML being approved as an ISO standard also list ample reasons as to why the Open Office plugin can never be complete, in exactly the same way as it cannot, and can never have, complete support for existing MS Office binary formats.




Member since:
2005-07-10
Define open for me. There is a list as long as both your arms and ample evidence that OOXML cannot be implemented outside of Microsoft Office. I suggest you read it.
Really so the OOXML plug-in for OOo didn't happen and is all vaporware?