Linked by Stephen Reilly on Mon 12th Mar 2007 17:47 UTC
Windows I have been both a Windows and Linux user for a long time (I started with Windows 3.1 and RedHat 5.1 kernel 2.0.x if I recall correctly) and have stuck with both for various reasons. I'm writing this article not as a DIY lofty vantage platform by which I can bash MS nor as a 'Why you should switched' flame bate piece, but have tried to keep an open mind and reflect the actually experience that I have had with Vista so far, regardless of OS political propaganda. Please keep in mind this is still an opinion piece and most probably to be taken with a pinch of salt.
Thread beginning with comment 220558
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Amen
by CPUGuy on Mon 12th Mar 2007 19:22 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Amen"
CPUGuy
Member since:
2005-07-06

And why not? It is a similar upgrade as far as the actual scope of what's new, etc...

Vista takes no more hardware than the current OSX.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[4]: Amen
by roverrobot on Tue 13th Mar 2007 08:36 in reply to "RE[3]: Amen"
roverrobot Member since:
2006-07-23


And why not? It is a similar upgrade as far as the actual scope of what's new, etc...

Vista takes no more hardware than the current OSX.


Hmm, this is news to me. I run OSX 10.4 on a 5 year old PowerMac G4 with NV17 very well. So I can smoothly run Vista on a 1GHz cpu with a NV17 video card? Great :-)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Amen
by CPUGuy on Tue 13th Mar 2007 11:36 in reply to "RE[4]: Amen"
CPUGuy Member since:
2005-07-06

G4 is eqivelant to late P3's/early P4's, and yes.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 0