Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Tue 10th Apr 2007 17:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 229230
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-06
Thanks, I did not know that. I have written a Windows Mobile App recently (for a companies internal use), but I used VB.Net and Windows Mobile 5.0 (the companies choice). I found it very easy to do. They even had an embedded web browser control that I used to give the user a simple file/upload screen to a web server (for further processing of data collected).
[Put on flame protective suite]
One thing Microsoft has always done right is treat their developer well. They provide powerful, easy-to-use tools. It sometimes seems like other platforms take a "see if you can do it" macho attitude towards development.
[Remove suit]
Nevertheless, I remain committed to the PalmOS. I honestly like the platform better. I believe the widgets are too heavy on Mobile Windows [The "everything is a window" paradigm]. In addition, IF Palm could deliver on an open Linux platform (and not the fragmented Linux platforms we see for current phones], I remain very interested. I also like the kernel-level support for running classic Palm apps. But the time is seriously running out for them. I hope it comes soon!