Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2007 13:19 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 238504
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: I agree, fair review
by Supreme Dragon on Tue 8th May 2007 20:13
in reply to "RE[6]: I agree, fair review"
A computer belongs to it's owner, not MS. Drm/activation/WGA infection is unacceptable:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=printArticle...
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/02/drm_in_windows.html
http://www.techweb.com/wire/software/167101037
Vista EULA is detestable:
http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/29/microsoft_vista_eula_analys...
RE[8]: I agree, fair review
by archer75 on Tue 8th May 2007 20:17
in reply to "RE[7]: I agree, fair review"





Member since:
2005-07-06
"Say you've just bought Pink Floyd's ?The Dark Side of the Moon?, released as a Super Audio CD (SACD) in its 30th anniversary edition in 2003, and you want to play it under Vista (I'm just using SACD as a representative example of protected audio content because it's a well-known technology, in practice Sony has refused to license it for playback on PCs). Since the S/PDIF link to your amplifier/speakers is regarded as insecure for playing the SA content, Vista would disable it, and you'd end up hearing a performance by Marcel Marceau instead of Pink
Sure, because you can play SACD or other protected audio content on OSX or Linux. Oh, wait, you can't!
http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/2006/12/31/windows_vista_drm_nonsense