Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 11th May 2007 18:17 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 239482
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"after Matrox recently almost completely stopped supporting the Linux customers with their newer cards "
Actually they are not good with vista too; till now they don't have vista working drivers for QID low profile Graphics cards which cost 800$.
One of our customer's workstation had this card and he wanted vista, and we contacted them to ask for the release date for vista drivers, and they told us next week, and every week they say next week!!
I don't like their treatment for their customers, especially ones who paid 800$ for their card.




Member since:
2005-07-08
There have been some news about Ati now aiming to improve their drivers and commitment to open source:
http://www.phoronix.com/?page=news_item&px=NTc2Mg
http://www.0xdeadbeef.com/weblog/?p=288
I don't know, I got a feeling like I had heard statements like that from Ati before too though.. Many people do claim that Ati's open source drivers might be better than nVidia open source drivers though - and maybe so? But the only Ati video card I ever had, many years ago, I immediately changed to a higher quality Matrox card that worked way better both with Windows and Linux. Then - after Matrox recently almost completely stopped supporting the Linux customers with their newer cards - I've said Matrox "goodbye!" and chosen and used Nvidia because of their well working, although proprietary drivers.
After reading news like this - also my next GPU might indeed be Intel too. But let's hope that also Ati will still be interested in supporting open source operating systems too.
Edited 2007-05-11 20:38