Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 1st Jul 2007 15:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 252134
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Hardly a good example
by Chicken Blood on Sun 1st Jul 2007 16:36
in reply to "RE[2]: Hardly a good example"
What I'm saying is why shouldn't the filemanager have a different use for that, to me the filemanager servers a different function to all other applications anyway.
It shouldn't have a different use for the same button. That defies user's expectations and hampers learning. Should the filemanager also redefine the behavior of the 'close' or the 'minimize' button?
A button with a different appearance that did not look like the well-defined 'toolbar pill' would have been adequate. That's all we're saying.






Member since:
2005-11-12
What I'm saying is why shouldn't the filemanager have a different use for that, to me the filemanager servers a different function to all other applications anyway.
It seems logical to me that spatial mode would be switched by the forth widget on the right hand side. Having two methods one to switch spatial and one to hide the toolbar seem abit off to me just for the finder.
Why can't the finder have a different function, applications dont have a spatial mode and if they did where would the button be!