To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sixth question (this is meant well - I'm a big SkyOS fan)
** Why on earth not a dual license instead of the insane closed source approach? **
I truly believe that SkyOS would stand a better chance than, say, Haiku at surviving as an "alternative" OS and at attracting developers if it was open, at least having an open "community" version which would include the kernel and drivers, but zero or few apps (I'm sure there are other commerical models, including service, etc)
Edited 2007-07-05 14:11
As an open source application, SkyOS made less headway than even ReactOS.
As a closed source application, SkyOS has made more headway than that last four owners of Amiga combined.
Additionally, open-source inevitably means fragmentation, as forks lead to very similar but still incompatible versions of what otherwise would have been the same system.
Edited 2007-07-05 14:17






Member since:
2005-06-29
It will send it to an early grave.
Early? SkyOS is more than 10 years old.