Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Aug 2007 21:37 UTC
Novell and Ximian In the wake of last week's ruling that Novell, and not SCO, controls the copyrights covering UNIX, Novell is reassuring Unix users that it has no plans to follow in SCO's footsteps. Given that the company is no longer in the business of selling UNIX, it has no reason to pursue any copyright claims.
Thread beginning with comment 263909
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

I suggest that we wait and see. I doubt that Novell knew they owned the copyrights until the SCO thing blew in and they looked into the details.

I'm not saying that they will turn around and assert their rights tomorrow. But their battle with Microsoft has not gone well. When push comes to shove, if the board feels that they have value, you can bet that they will move to "monetize" them. Possibly under a new chairman if the stockholders decide to oust Hovsepian as they did Messman. Stockholders (that's you and me) become ugly, cold, heartless creatures when they put their stockholder's caps on.

And remember. You don't have to have a case to sue. SCO had less of one than Novell. We're at over 4 and a half years now.

So I say watch and wait, and we can revisit the issue when they decide to act.

Edited 2007-08-16 12:58

Reply Parent Score: 2

glarepate Member since:
2006-01-04

Then I take it you have never seen any of the documents exchanged between Novell and Caldera/tSCOg wherein Novell explicitly denied the validity of all claims to any IP not actually written or subsequently purchased by the Gang That Couldn't Sue Straight.

There was never any question about Caldera not owning stuff that they never bought from the Santa Cruz Operation to begin with and Novell slapped them hard with notice of that fact from the very beginning. However, faith frequently overrides reason. That is it's advantage over rational thought: It can accomplish miracles that violate the rules of the mundane world.

YMMV

Reply Parent Score: 1

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

"""
Then I take it you have never seen any of the documents exchanged between Novell and Caldera/tSCOg wherein Novell explicitly denied the validity of all claims to any IP not actually written or subsequently purchased by the Gang That Couldn't Sue Straight.
"""

Some time after SCO pressed their law suits, Novell took a look and made their claims. SCO decided to press their "Slander of Title" suit.

There was *every* question about who owned the copyrights. The court of public opinion, at least in the more informed circles, decided early on that SCO did not own the copyrights.

But the court of law has only just ruled on the matter.

It took 4+ years for a court of law to decide. So the alternating question marks and exclamation points in your subject line are quite inappropriate.

I maintain that until the SCO thing blew in, the documents in question were sitting in a drawer with about an inch and a half of dust on top.

Reply Parent Score: 2

grat Member since:
2006-02-02

But their battle with Microsoft has not gone well.

Yeah-- They've only managed to extract $884 *million* dollars from MS in the last 3 years. And Novell agreed to pay back $200 million over the next 5 years, based on revenue from SLES.

Terrible track record there. And they're gaining traction with the same set of PHB's who for years have refused to contemplate Linux-- It's slower than Novell would like, true, but anytime you see an announcement about some company switching over a few thousand desktops, chances are, they're switching to SuSE.

You're spreading FUD* about Novell. Plain and simple. Bill Gates would be proud. ;)

* Yes, I know what FUD is-- It's making negative statements backed up by nothing but a desire to see someone fail.

Edited 2007-08-16 19:23

Reply Parent Score: 0

sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

Terrible track record there.


Yes, it is. As I said, their battle with Microsoft has not gone well. In the second link, note how NOVL has lost over 80% of it's value over the last 7 years.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NOVL&t=my&l=off&z=m&q=l&c=msft

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=NOVL&t=my&l=off&z=m&q=l&c=

Edited 2007-08-17 16:07

Reply Parent Score: 2