Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2007 21:55 UTC, submitted by deanna
Thread beginning with comment 266927
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Large parts of Glib are simply unnecessary, having been superseded by things like C99 or simply duplicate existing standards (GThread: use PThreads!). The bits that remain are often used incorrectly. The original idea behind Glib was that a project should copy in the parts they required, but these days Glib is treated like an extended libc where projects link against the DSO.

I just don't like Glib. I never have. It may be partially irrational, but my hatred is based on some good reasons.