Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2007 21:36 UTC, submitted by dylansmrjones
Thread beginning with comment 271503
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Re: Groklaw has a story on it, too.
by lemur2 on Sat 15th Sep 2007 11:39
in reply to "RE[3]: Re: Groklaw has a story on it, too."
All the GPL does is prevent theft. It's nothing more than reciprocal altruism.
I'd agree, but I would just use the term "collaboration".
The bulk of Scientific knowledge is built up by collaboration. Scientists working off each others discoveries.
The GP simply allows the same methods of collaboration applied to software development. It uses the power of copyright law to prevent anyone subverting the ability to collaborate on the software so being developed.




Member since:
2005-07-24
Fight for free speech I see in your data? Nice, it's my credo too, freedom of knowledge for *everyone*. And with a copyleft you're abusing this freedom. Of course you will not learn this in computer science, but history and philosophy. I'm not a BSD zealot, but a 'freedom zealot'. I blame the GPL and RMS in the public for their abuse of real freedom, but I would never oppress other people - that's the difference. Telling people something about dictatorship is your free speech, but actually building some dictatorship is something I would confront.
Bull. The freedom to steal and cheat is not legitimate freedom. All the GPL does is prevent theft. It's nothing more than reciprocal altruism.