Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2007 19:39 UTC, submitted by gonzo
Thread beginning with comment 276121
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-08-11
"I can see that I should have made a further edit for clarification. I didn't say that the lawsuits and FUD campaigns start tomorrow. MS wants to see .net widely adopted. They are willing to see it run on other platforms for now. But in the long term, they want .net to run on Windows and Windows only. (That's just Business 101, isn't it?) "
I gotta disagree with you, as I think the motivation behind this is to keep developers on Windows. They don't care where the final product actually runs, but if they can sell lots of copies of Visual Studio, then they still win,as every copy of VS needs a copy of Windows.
Being able to say that the code you write will be cross platform, well that's gravy. One of MSs strengths have always been a strong developer community (MSDN is a great resource), and the recent free versions of VS will only increase the amount of developers on Windows, who hopefully will upgrade to a paid copy when they outlive VS Express's functionality.
This I believe is one time that MS should, and will encourage the OSS version of their technology, as it is just another conduit to sell VS and Windows.