To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In my opinion, it shouldn't be too hard.
It is hard, because no one has even been able to do this on desktops. It also shows a true ignorance for what's involved that I see displayed by an awful lot of Linux distribution companies. I thought they might have learned by now.
It's just that the linux crew believes that nobody should use GUI admin tools, which is STUPID.
I hear this silly, silly argument time and again. If you believe that pointing people to the command line negates having good graphical tools then I'm afraid that is one of the primary reasons why there is more than an element of truth in the article. There's no reason why headless servers cannot be run, with a management framework to enable GUI management elsewhere. There is no such framework, and no such GUI tools.
In 'enterprise' type circles, management tools that people can pick up and use are absolutely everything. Squealing 'command line' is going to get you no response other than people buying more Windows servers.
Edited 2007-10-26 13:35





Member since:
2005-07-06
But i belive that after some time, when management tools with the style of Active Directory, Group Policy etc... are stock standard for linux, things will change.
You say this as if producing graphical management tools is easy. Guess what? There's nothing around.
I have some bias, but i think that Ubuntu will get this going well before the rest if looking at their desktop distro is anything to go by.
Ubuntu haven't got a snowball in hell's chabce of doing this. They've produced nothing approaching MMC, and quite frankly, their GUI tools are not up to the job. If Red Hat hasn't been able to do it after a decade, I fail to see what Ubuntu are doing differently.
Edited 2007-10-26 12:01