Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Wed 12th Dec 2007 05:47 UTC, submitted by LinucksGirl
Thread beginning with comment 290129
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: No mention of Haskell
by null_pointer_us on Wed 12th Dec 2007 23:51
in reply to "RE: No mention of Haskell"






Member since:
2005-07-24
Perhaps it's because it's just too easy in Haskell, but I find it odd that the author makes no mention of a language that does lazy evaluation with no extra hoop jumping required.