Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Dec 2007 10:17 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Thread beginning with comment 292370
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Windows XP needed a revamp."
This wasn't a revamp, and certainly not as large as SP2 for XP was. Besides, MS has made it very clear for a while now that XP SP3 would ship at the same time as Vista SP1.
Agreed that it's a good move on MS's part to make the RC's public though. Everyone wins.





Member since:
2006-07-26
Well, like or need Windows or not, it is obviously clear for me that given the Vista "failure", Windows XP needed a revamp. It is a pain to install a new system with Windows XP and have to download lots and lots of upgrades to the system. This SP3 can help with that, and I like that Microsoft makes it public.