Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Feb 2008 14:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 300310
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
Wasn't Corba so horrible KDE created DCOP (and now DBUS is partly designed after it)? And Gnome, which officially supported it, barely used it so they jumped on the DBUS car as soon as it got kind'a usable?
If my memory serves me right, CORBA already proved to be incapable of serving the free desktop - the Wikipedia page kind'a confirms that, talking about it's design- and implementation flaws.
Google brings you to a few pages:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/2005-January/002007.html
(read further on that page for reasons why Corba failed).
And the D-BUS faq talks about CORBA and other alternatives as well:
http://dbus.freedesktop.org/doc/dbus-faq.html
From what I've read, CORBA might theoretically be great - but in real life, it sucked for both KDE and Gnome. DBUS on the other hand already proved to be a good solution - KDE seems happy with it, Gnome as well.
I don't know much technical details, so I'd love if someone who does can elaborate a bit more...