To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
“Since [encryption] uses CPU cycles, an OEM may have to bump the speed grade on the CPU to maintain equivalent multimedia performance. This cost is passed on to purchasers of multimedia PCs” — ATI.
This is the DRM that stops high def videos from playing at full res on non HDCP enabled monitors/video cards
this comes from:
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html
DRM is only enforced (active) if you use HD content on Vista with Microsoft's Media playing tools.
For non HD content and non MS media playback software DRM is non exisitant. It doesn't stop you creating or playing back media.
I'm also usre that by the time HD Video content becomes mainstream on computers (re BlueRay Drives) then VLC or equivelents will be able to play back that content bypassing MS DRM components.
Gutmann's article has only tangential connections with reality. He makes a lot of easily-confirmable assertions (you would only need a profiler or kernel debugger to prove any of them... both of these things are provided for free by Microsoft). Despite the lack of actual confirmation of any of his claims and the opposing statements of Microsoft employees who actually work on the relevant parts of Windows, people still believe that there is some mysterious DRM that's magically consuming their cycles without doing anything to confirm it.





Member since:
2006-01-02
The people who are telling you it's DRM are misinformed (perhaps intentionally). For the components they share, Vista and 2k8 have the exact same binaries. There are obviously components that are present in the client that aren't in the server and vice-versa. But there is no specific 'DRM' component, so it's not one of those things.
Edited 2008-03-06 15:26 UTC