Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Mar 2008 21:37 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 305687
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes because a fork != distro.
FreeBSD
OpenBSD
NetBSD
DragonFlyBSD
Some smaller ones:
MirOS
MidnightBSD
PC-BSD and DesktopBSD are neither forks nor distros (in terms of a Linux distro). They are preconfigured FreeBSDs.
BSD first was a patchset to original UNIX in the 70s. Later it was a fork. SunOS was a fork of BSD and so on. So there is nothing wrong about it. If _you_ don't like a fork, _you_ will not use it - so in the end the community decides about the outcome of a fork.
Am I the only one which feels that a distro hell is creeping in the BSD camp ?
In what sense (other than there being more than the three you were previously aware of)?
In any case, there's no such thing as a BSD "distro", at least in the sense that term's applied to Linux. Linux distros are conglomerations of externally- and independently-maintained components. BSD variants separately maintain their own kernel and userland components in a highly integrated fashion, using code lineally descended from William Jolitz's 386BSD).




Member since:
2006-01-11
Am I the only one which feels that a distro hell is creeping in the BSD camp ?