Linked by John Finigan on Mon 21st Apr 2008 19:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 311134
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: ZFS is a dead end.
by segedunum on Fri 25th Apr 2008 02:51
in reply to "RE[2]: ZFS is a dead end."
Urh, you do realise that ZFS is already available in FreeBSD 7.0, right?
Errrrr, no it isn't. It's extremely experimental and barely functional, and on limited architectures at that. Hell, even running it on 32-bit systems will leave you with something exceptionally borked. ZFS also needs exceptional tuning to work with non-Solaris kernels. There is a huge class of hardware it simply will not run on - probably ever.
I've seen some people wandering around assuming that they can just run ZFS in FreeBSD, and run it in production. That's just.........scary.
Edited 2008-04-25 02:56 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-11
Urh, you do realise that ZFS is already available in FreeBSD 7.0, right?
Export a zvol and put whatever filesystem you want on top (okay, may only UFS is directly supported, but you can use iSCSI and such to export the zvol to other systems and then put whatever FS you want on top).