Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th Apr 2008 21:12 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems When Asus released its Eee PC, praise was almost universal. People loved the device's size, low price, and the fact it came with Linux appealed to many geeks. Consequently, the device sold rather well, and was a hit for Asus. However, the device had two major shortcomings: its small screen (7" 800x480), and its relatively short battery life. Asus took the critcism to heart, and came up with the Asus Eee PC 900, which has a 9" 1024x600 screen. So, what's the verdict?
Thread beginning with comment 311585
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Looks Nice
by StephenBeDoper on Sat 26th Apr 2008 20:15 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Looks Nice"
StephenBeDoper
Member since:
2005-07-06

Here's hoping Lenovo will do something about it...


For the forseeable future, you'd probably be best off to pick up a refurb. x31 or x40.

Most of the big laptop makers are stubbornly refusing to sell any laptops below a certain price point (and, by extension, profit margin). It seems to be the Apple business model, where products aren't discontinued when they become technically-obsolete - instead, products are discontinued once the profit margin falls to a certain level.

It seems to be largely a holding-action, to try to prevent laptop computers from becoming as "commoditized" as desktop PCs. I suspect it's going to be ultimately futile - there's obviously demand for low-cost laptops. And with companies like Asus stepping up to fill that demand, that's going to eventually/hopefully to force Dell, Acer, HP, Lenovo, et al.

It was starting to feel as the big-name laptop makers were engaging in round-about/accidental price fixing - by way of an unwillingness to compete on price when it comes to laptops (out of fear of jeopardizing the price premium that laptops typically command).

IMO, that's the best thing about the Eee PC: its existence will (hopefully) shake off some of the stagnation that has become the status-quo with laptops.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[4]: Looks Nice
by zima on Sat 26th Apr 2008 22:50 in reply to "RE[3]: Looks Nice"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

I'm not sure...when it comes to "spirit" of your massage, I feel that I wholehearthly agree. BUT in practise I can easily get Acer machine that's actually cheaper than Eee...and HP/Lenovo laptops priced around the same.

Perhaps what you were saying becomes more true with a little twist: other manufacturers want ultraportables to remain a luxury item, while they DO flood market with cheap ordinary laptops.

And yeah, I could go at some point with a Thinkpad X...the thing is, while ordinary 15" laptops are too big for my taste, Eee-style ones are too small. 12-13" is a sweet spot for me (with 14" borderline ok, but I'll still have to pay ~200€ premium now that I'm in a market for new R61)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

IBM had the PC110 RE[4]: Looks Nice
by RavinRay on Tue 29th Apr 2008 00:23 in reply to "RE[3]: Looks Nice"
RavinRay Member since:
2005-11-26

"Here's hoping Lenovo will do something about it...


For the forseeable future, you'd probably be best off to pick up a refurb. x31 or x40.
"
IBM Japan had a cult hit in the 90's with the palmtop-sized PC110 with DOS/V, Micro PM GUI, and WebBoy browser. Hobbyists have installed all sorts of OS'es on it from Windows 3.1 and OS/2 to NT 4.0 and Linux and even PC/Geos. If Lenovo does a successor it just might have a bigger hit this time around.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1