Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 28th May 2008 19:09 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 316004
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Still waiting for an application...
by sbergman27 on Wed 28th May 2008 20:45
in reply to "Still waiting for an application..."
I agree. Then again, I'm still waiting for 3D on the desktop to reveal advantages which are not of the "reaching" nature.
I suspect that we will be well into the "Touchiz Fusion" era before anything solid shows up. But solutions in search of a problem are like that. They eventually find one, if there is really any benefit to them. ;-)
RE[2]: Still waiting for an application...
by orestes on Wed 28th May 2008 20:55
in reply to "RE: Still waiting for an application..."
The advantage of 3d accelerated desktops is offloading the processing load to your graphics card from your main processor. That and it can make remote desktop type apps vastly more efficient.
I will agree most of the user visible effects are cute toys and nothing more though
Edited 2008-05-28 20:56 UTC
RE: Still waiting for an application...
by netpython on Thu 29th May 2008 20:28
in reply to "Still waiting for an application..."
RE: Still waiting for an application...
by jayson.knight on Thu 29th May 2008 22:30
in reply to "Still waiting for an application..."
Every multitouch demo trots out the same silly demos. Throwing photos around, resizing them. Well no one does this. The mouse is much more accurate at moving things around, and the mouse wheel is much better at zooming.
It's a demo Beavis...something that anyone looking at it for 10 seconds can easily grasp and understand. It'll be up to application developers to make useful software that will run on it, and I'm sure many such as myself are already cooking up some great ideas.







Member since:
2005-09-21
Every multitouch demo trots out the same silly demos. Throwing photos around, resizing them. Well no one does this. The mouse is much more accurate at moving things around, and the mouse wheel is much better at zooming.
Same with the Google Earth demo (or whatever microsoft decided to call their knockoff). There's nothing wrong with the mouse here. It's much easier to use the mouse+mouse wheel to zoom around on a globe than it is to use gestures.
Waving around water? On-screen piano? Please.. These are neat toys, but not anything useful.
Of course these things are nice on a public access kiosk and handhelds, but not for the traditional laptops and desktops, and those aren't being replaced anytime soon.