Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 5th Jun 2008 19:58 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 317630
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-09-08
The Xbox 360 is really not using Windows. It has a kernel based on the Xbox OS, which in turn was loosely based on the lowest-level basic parts of the Windows NT 5 kernel. By now, it's less closely related to desktop Windows than Windows CE is.
Anyway, the problem isn't that the kernel isn't portable. The problem is that the drivers and userland are not portable. Without it's huge base of existing software, Windows is effectively worthless. An ARM version of Windows could do nothing more than run the default included apps. An ARM version of Linux can do everything an x86 version can, except run the Flash plugin, Wine, and commercial games.
Even if you're selling the thing as an appliance, so third-party software doesn't matter, Microsoft are the only ones who could legally offer an appliance-style version of Windows. They don't - you'd have to use one of their desktop systems. At least with Linux, hardware manufacturers can roll their own.
That's ignoring WinCE, of course, but there's not a lot in the way of pre-existing Windows CE software to work with. A hardware manufacturer might write their own UI, but I doubt they'd write their own office suite or web browser.
Edited 2008-06-07 12:37 UTC