To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sad to say but it would suffice to put on Windows-like themes and icons and those people would'nt have a clue they are running another OS.
That's the problem I find with computer training in general: rather than teaching users about concepts, they are taught to work with a specific interface. Change the interface while keeping the same concept and everyone is lost. That would be like learning to drive a specific car make, and then be completely clueless about using any other type of car.
I agree that there should be much more communication about GNU/Linux. I remember some interactive apps HP had on its computers a decade ago, it was supposed to help new users get familiar with their OS. It might make sense to produce a DVD user manual, teaching people how to get familiar with Linux. But the problem might be having them open the DVD player app in the first place.
Sure, right up until they download the latest version of Windows Live Messenger, or any other Windows app and are unable to run it--and no, Wine is not sufficient. Or how about trying to install a printer driver, for instance, that Linux doesn't support? Then they call tech support and ask why and find out they don't actually have Windows. Now, I don't care how perfect Linux may be for netbooks, if it looks like Windows, the average customer is going to expect Windows. And further, they're not going to settle for anything else. So in this situation, a frustrated customer is now mad at the Netbook manufacturer and at Linux in general, and anyone else who may have spewed the freedom rhetoric at them--they could care less about freedom if it means they can't do what _they_ want their computer to do.
Or maybe those people are not dumb? Maybe they just tried to do something a bit advanced and had real problems? Why is it so hard to say that linux is not the best OS ever and might need some enhancements here and there?
Honestly, thinking that people don't like linux (desktop) because they don't recognize the theme is just ignoring the problems (if not insulting).
Notice that this is exactly how people learn to drive. I mean, the instructor can make some remarks about how something is done in other types of car, but when it comes to it you drive one specific car, and when you change cars it always takes some getting used to.
I don't think there's a way out of that. That's how the human brain works: from specific to general, not the other way around. First you learn how to do something with a specific tool, then you try a similar but slightly different tool and so on, until you slowly start to learn the basic similarities and differences, the big picture.
What I'm getting at is, if you want people to feel comfortable with Linux and other FOSS tools, you have to increase their direct contact with such tools, there's no way around that.
If you want Linux to succeed on netbooks, manufacturers need to get their act together and boldly advertise that Linux is NOT Windows and that it's better because of x, y, z, etc. Otherwise, you'll just end up with the situation we're currently in.
But but but......surely you can't be suggesting that they MARKET Linux, are you?
I mean, that might differentiate the OS from Windows and OSX to the general public at large, causing people to be interested in it.







Member since:
2005-07-07
Why do you think Apple spends millions on those I'm a PC, I'm a Mac ad campaigns? While technical people may find those ads annoying, they are very effective in conveying the message that Macs are not PCs to the average consumer.
If you want Linux to succeed on netbooks, manufacturers need to get their act together and boldly advertise that Linux is NOT Windows and that it's better because of x, y, z, etc. Otherwise, you'll just end up with the situation we're currently in.