Linked by David Adams on Wed 29th Oct 2008 20:55 UTC, submitted by Geir Johasen
Opera Software An interesting NYT Bits blog entry covers Opera's mobile browser. Buried in the middle of the article is this quote: "Opera's engineers have developed a version of Opera Mini that can run on an Apple iPhone, but Apple won't let the company release it because it competes with Apple's own Safari browser." It also talks about Opera on the Wii and browsers in cars. A good read. My Take: But back to the iPhone. As tempted as I am to just shrug it off, since Apple is free to run its App Store any way it pleases, as an enthusiastic iPhone user, I think Apple is shooting itself in the foot here, as it is with all the "competitive" apps being rejected. Apple does stand to lose some Google revenue by letting people use other browsers, but they have much more to gain by unleashing the creativity of the developer community and giving them the freedom to improve or replace core iPhone functionality. Hopefully competition from Android forces them to wake up.
Thread beginning with comment 335736
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: iPhone is one browser
by squelart on Thu 30th Oct 2008 23:19 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: iPhone is one browser"
squelart
Member since:
2007-03-22

You are not making sense.

You don't develop for the iPhone browser.[...]
if you do develop for the iPhone browser[...]


Who's not making sense? :-)

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[5]: iPhone is one browser
by hangman on Sat 1st Nov 2008 08:34 in reply to "RE[4]: iPhone is one browser"
hangman Member since:
2007-09-05

I said that you shouldn't do it, but if you do... etc. Was it really that hard to understand?

Reply Parent Score: 1