Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Nov 2008 19:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 337458
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Macrat
by mtzmtulivu on Mon 17th Nov 2008 21:06
in reply to "RE: Comment by Macrat"
the speed in reality will also depends on how fast the data can be read and written to ..hard drives rps will matter, under what stress the os is under will matter, how much fragmented the hard drive will matter ..
as they say, "you are as fast as your slowest component" ..to total speed will depends on a lot than just what the spec says ..
RE[2]: Comment by Macrat
by red_devel on Mon 17th Nov 2008 21:15
in reply to "RE: Comment by Macrat"
USB 2.0 can support 400MBps, but most hardware manufacturers are incredibly cheap in product design. I see 12MBps out of most modern usb devices, save for some relatively expensive devices.
Hold the train for a second. I think we're getting seriously confused on terminology. Whether or not the B is capitalized makes a factor of 8 difference! bps is bits per second. Bps is Bytes per second. There are 8 bits to a Byte. USB 2.0 supports a theoretical 400 Mbps, therefore a theoretical 50 MBps. So, if you're seeing 12 MBps this is on the order of 25% of the theoretical maximum, and makes good sense.
USB 3.0, if we are to believe the titlepage is correct, will support 4.8Gbps, so in other words, somewhere around 600MBps range.
Please note, this is further confused by the fact that 1 GB != 1000 MB, but rather 1024 MB, so please realize all these numbers are approximate. To be honest, I'm not sure if the manufacturers report using 1000 bits/Kbit to make things look faster, the same way hardrive manufacturers do to make drives look bigger.
edit: typos!
Edited 2008-11-17 21:17 UTC






Member since:
2006-03-27
"USB 3.0 spec can theoretically support data-transfer speeds of up to 4.8Gbps"
And the speed in reality?